Share with a co-worker
The Challenge
Fouling in the hydrotreater heat exchangers gradually restricts unit throughput. To compensate, operators open a control valve to maintain production. However, once the valve approaches 95% open, engineers lose operational flexibility and are forced into reactive cleaning.
The key challenge was identifying the moment when fouling begins to meaningfully impact production, before reaching the constraint limit.
- Progressive fouling reducing heat transfer efficiency
- Valve opening used as compensation mechanism
- Loss of visibility once valve exceeds 95%
- Reactive rather than proactive cleaning strategy
The Approach
The team translated pressure differential behavior into a predictive fouling indicator.
- Differential pressure formula: A calculated tag was created to represent exchanger pressure drop
- Correlation validation: Analysis confirmed pressure difference as a reliable fouling indicator, correlating it to the manual valve increase
- Constraint window identification: Time-series analysis focused on periods when valve opening exceeded 90%
- Predictive threshold creation: The moment when fouling began constraining production was identified, defining the ΔP when valve opening > 90%
- Monitor configuration: An alert was created to notify engineers before throughput was impacted
Key Insight
Pressure differential trends provide early warning signals, allowing fouling to be addressed before production losses occur.
Results
The Takeaway
By identifying the precise moment fouling becomes a production constraint, the team moved from reactive cleaning to predictive maintenance, protecting throughput and reducing operational disruptions.
The Challenge
Fouling in the hydrotreater heat exchangers gradually restricts unit throughput. To compensate, operators open a control valve to maintain production. However, once the valve approaches 95% open, engineers lose operational flexibility and are forced into reactive cleaning.
The key challenge was identifying the moment when fouling begins to meaningfully impact production, before reaching the constraint limit.
- Progressive fouling reducing heat transfer efficiency
- Valve opening used as compensation mechanism
- Loss of visibility once valve exceeds 95%
- Reactive rather than proactive cleaning strategy
The Approach
The team translated pressure differential behavior into a predictive fouling indicator.
- Differential pressure formula: A calculated tag was created to represent exchanger pressure drop
- Correlation validation: Analysis confirmed pressure difference as a reliable fouling indicator, correlating it to the manual valve increase
- Constraint window identification: Time-series analysis focused on periods when valve opening exceeded 90%
- Predictive threshold creation: The moment when fouling began constraining production was identified, defining the ΔP when valve opening > 90%
- Monitor configuration: An alert was created to notify engineers before throughput was impacted
Key Insight
Pressure differential trends provide early warning signals, allowing fouling to be addressed before production losses occur.
Results
The Takeaway
By identifying the precise moment fouling becomes a production constraint, the team moved from reactive cleaning to predictive maintenance, protecting throughput and reducing operational disruptions.
Access now
Share with a co-worker
The Challenge
Fouling in the hydrotreater heat exchangers gradually restricts unit throughput. To compensate, operators open a control valve to maintain production. However, once the valve approaches 95% open, engineers lose operational flexibility and are forced into reactive cleaning.
The key challenge was identifying the moment when fouling begins to meaningfully impact production, before reaching the constraint limit.
- Progressive fouling reducing heat transfer efficiency
- Valve opening used as compensation mechanism
- Loss of visibility once valve exceeds 95%
- Reactive rather than proactive cleaning strategy
The Approach
The team translated pressure differential behavior into a predictive fouling indicator.
- Differential pressure formula: A calculated tag was created to represent exchanger pressure drop
- Correlation validation: Analysis confirmed pressure difference as a reliable fouling indicator, correlating it to the manual valve increase
- Constraint window identification: Time-series analysis focused on periods when valve opening exceeded 90%
- Predictive threshold creation: The moment when fouling began constraining production was identified, defining the ΔP when valve opening > 90%
- Monitor configuration: An alert was created to notify engineers before throughput was impacted
Key Insight
Pressure differential trends provide early warning signals, allowing fouling to be addressed before production losses occur.
Results
The Takeaway
By identifying the precise moment fouling becomes a production constraint, the team moved from reactive cleaning to predictive maintenance, protecting throughput and reducing operational disruptions.
Access now
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with our latest news and updates.
Other Webinars on Demand
Press Play on Operational Improvement
.jpg)
Other Resources
Explore Our Newest Content to Maximize Your Operational Efficiency
