All Resources
Use case

Heat Exchanger Leakage Detection Using Mass Balance Analytics and Automated Monitoring

Pablo Sanchez
Industry Principal
•
Reading time:
Watch time:
2
min.
•
Updated:
Watch time:
September 24, 2026

The Challenge

Water leakages were intermittently observed in a steam heat exchanger system and could only be detected indirectly by monitoring the level of a collection tank. While this confirmed that leaks existed, it did not reveal where they originated. Engineers needed a reliable way to pinpoint the source and timing of leakage events in order to reduce wastewater losses and improve operational efficiency.

The main difficulty was that leaks did not occur continuously and could originate from multiple exchangers. Without advanced analytics, identifying which unit was responsible required time-consuming manual investigation and process shutdown risk.

‌

The Approach

Engineers deployed an analytical workflow combining event detection, process calculations, and monitoring:

  • Value-based searches were configured to detect periods when tank level dropped, indicating leakage events
  • Mass balance calculations were applied across individual heat exchangers to isolate the most likely source
  • Derived tags were created to quantify deviations between expected and actual flow conditions
  • OEE-related metrics were incorporated to evaluate operational impact and efficiency losses
  • Automated monitoring was activated to detect future leakage signatures in real time

‌

Tank level drops found with value-based search (multiple conditions search) and collapsed filters comparison.

‍

This structured method transformed a vague symptom (tank level drop) into a traceable diagnostic signal tied to specific assets.

‌

The Results

‌

AreaOutcome
Leak identificationLeakage events reliably detected
Root cause isolationProbable leaking exchangers identified
Monitoring capabilityAutomated alerts for future leaks enabled
Resource efficiencyReduced water waste and utility consumption

‌

The Takeaway

The implementation established a proactive leakage detection system that improves process efficiency while reducing environmental and operational costs. By combining mass balance analytics with automated monitoring, engineers gained continuous visibility into exchanger performance and could intervene earlier—ultimately increasing OEE and overall plant reliability.

‌

Energy & natural resources
Asset Performance Management
Operational Performance Management
Anomaly Detection
Waste Reduction
Process Engineer
Maintenance Engineer
Sustainability Lead
Plant Manager
Share with a co-worker

The Challenge

Water leakages were intermittently observed in a steam heat exchanger system and could only be detected indirectly by monitoring the level of a collection tank. While this confirmed that leaks existed, it did not reveal where they originated. Engineers needed a reliable way to pinpoint the source and timing of leakage events in order to reduce wastewater losses and improve operational efficiency.

The main difficulty was that leaks did not occur continuously and could originate from multiple exchangers. Without advanced analytics, identifying which unit was responsible required time-consuming manual investigation and process shutdown risk.

‌

The Approach

Engineers deployed an analytical workflow combining event detection, process calculations, and monitoring:

  • Value-based searches were configured to detect periods when tank level dropped, indicating leakage events
  • Mass balance calculations were applied across individual heat exchangers to isolate the most likely source
  • Derived tags were created to quantify deviations between expected and actual flow conditions
  • OEE-related metrics were incorporated to evaluate operational impact and efficiency losses
  • Automated monitoring was activated to detect future leakage signatures in real time

‌

Tank level drops found with value-based search (multiple conditions search) and collapsed filters comparison.

‍

This structured method transformed a vague symptom (tank level drop) into a traceable diagnostic signal tied to specific assets.

‌

The Results

‌

AreaOutcome
Leak identificationLeakage events reliably detected
Root cause isolationProbable leaking exchangers identified
Monitoring capabilityAutomated alerts for future leaks enabled
Resource efficiencyReduced water waste and utility consumption

‌

The Takeaway

The implementation established a proactive leakage detection system that improves process efficiency while reducing environmental and operational costs. By combining mass balance analytics with automated monitoring, engineers gained continuous visibility into exchanger performance and could intervene earlier—ultimately increasing OEE and overall plant reliability.

‌

Access now

Share with a co-worker

The Challenge

Water leakages were intermittently observed in a steam heat exchanger system and could only be detected indirectly by monitoring the level of a collection tank. While this confirmed that leaks existed, it did not reveal where they originated. Engineers needed a reliable way to pinpoint the source and timing of leakage events in order to reduce wastewater losses and improve operational efficiency.

The main difficulty was that leaks did not occur continuously and could originate from multiple exchangers. Without advanced analytics, identifying which unit was responsible required time-consuming manual investigation and process shutdown risk.

‌

The Approach

Engineers deployed an analytical workflow combining event detection, process calculations, and monitoring:

  • Value-based searches were configured to detect periods when tank level dropped, indicating leakage events
  • Mass balance calculations were applied across individual heat exchangers to isolate the most likely source
  • Derived tags were created to quantify deviations between expected and actual flow conditions
  • OEE-related metrics were incorporated to evaluate operational impact and efficiency losses
  • Automated monitoring was activated to detect future leakage signatures in real time

‌

Tank level drops found with value-based search (multiple conditions search) and collapsed filters comparison.

‍

This structured method transformed a vague symptom (tank level drop) into a traceable diagnostic signal tied to specific assets.

‌

The Results

‌

AreaOutcome
Leak identificationLeakage events reliably detected
Root cause isolationProbable leaking exchangers identified
Monitoring capabilityAutomated alerts for future leaks enabled
Resource efficiencyReduced water waste and utility consumption

‌

The Takeaway

The implementation established a proactive leakage detection system that improves process efficiency while reducing environmental and operational costs. By combining mass balance analytics with automated monitoring, engineers gained continuous visibility into exchanger performance and could intervene earlier—ultimately increasing OEE and overall plant reliability.

‌

Access now

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay up to date with our latest news and updates.

Thanks for submitting the form.